Apply AI

Should you tag resumes manually?

As part of the candidate screening process, some organizations task their recruiters with manual tagging of the resumes they review. The idea here is to increase the usability of talent databases by generating metadata manually.

In our last post, we covered 4 reasons why candidate screening is not a human task. This post builds on those ideas.

As part of the candidate screening process, some organizations task their recruiters with manual tagging of the resumes they review.  The idea here is to increase the usability of talent databases by generating metadata manually. Recruiters will manually tag resumes with skills, capabilities, industries, roles, and any other attribute they value. In theory, this would generate a database with enough depth to become navigable and thusly incredibly valuable to the organization.

Unfortunately, in practice, manual tagging just doesn’t work. Here’s why:

Time commitment & scalability

Recruiters currently spend 7.4 seconds reviewing each resume. If tasks like tagging are added to the equation, recruiters now need to do more than just skim. They need to read, interpret, and assign tags. This drastic workflow change will take more time and the only way to scale is to increase the number of people doing this manual review work.

Willingness & completeness

Behavior change is hard. If recruiters have been doing something a certain way for years and a new process is introduced, it’s likely going to be an uphill battle. When some talent records inevitably fall through the cracks, the practice becomes far less valuable because some talent records remain 'dark data' that can't be surfaced easily.

Accuracy & consistency

As with any repetitious human task, accuracy will be an issue. People have different interpretations of words and ideas which will indefinitely lead to inconsistent metadata. Biases are a tool that can help humans get the job done quicker, but accuracy and consistency across a group of reviewers will suffer greatly.

Measurement & traceability

A human-driven process also limits the capability to systematically trace the justification for certain decisions. The human decision-making process is complicated and often riddled with subconscious biases that simply cannot be explained. This prohibits the ability to systematically improve the metadata tagging.

These issues all stem from the fact that natural language data is both prevalent in HR and incredibly hard to deal with at scale. Talent acquisition is centered around resumes and greater strategic workforce planning initiatives often involve some form of unstructured language such as employee reviews, descriptions of project work, or written communication.

Whether hiring today or anticipating future organizational needs, it’s imperative to have a deep understanding of your talent. Mission-critical knowledge and insight is hidden in the natural language documents that companies have been storing for decades. The best way to achieve a deeper understanding of the workforce is to unlock the value of this data. With a powerful combination of technologies, this is now possible.

Learn how AI for talent classification can impact your organization in our ebook: Talent Classification Guide for the AI Era of HR.

Latest Articles

View All

The use cases for AI you didn't know existed

You've probably read about how AI is being used in data security, financial trading, healthcare, fraud detection, or elsewhere. AI has taken hold in these industries, in part, because there is “big data” associated with each and ready-made AI solutions. But, what about the industries or use cases that don’t involve mountains of numerical data?

February 3, 2021

Talent classification cited as a new way for organizations to improve internal talent mobility

In the December 7th issue of First Analysis Quarterly Insights, managing director Corey Greendale concludes that there’s a significant information gap that makes it difficult for organizations to optimize internal talent mobility.

February 3, 2021

What it’s like to be intern at Vettd.ai

Vettd.ai college interns are gaining a unique perspective about the difference between classroom learning and real-world experience. They are being challenged to use open-source and low-cost software components to create prototype applications to compliment or compete with alternative approaches to natural language processing (NLP) solutions.

February 3, 2021