Learn AI

Reviewing Resumes is Broken

Reviewing resumes can be the hardest and most demanding part of the entire hiring process. It’s extremely time consuming and is the first of many steps in a lengthy process. Unfortunately, it’s entirely necessary because job boards aren’t dead yet and resumes remain the primary way that candidates present themselves to companies.

Reviewing resumes can be the hardest and most demanding part of the entire hiring process. It’s extremely time consuming and is the first of many steps in a lengthy process. Unfortunately, it’s entirely necessary because job boards aren’t dead yet and resumes remain the primary way that candidates present themselves to companies. Social recruiting has its advantages but collecting resumes is still the most effective way to start the hiring process.

If resumes continue to be the way forward, we need to figure out how to address some of the issues surrounding the review process. We’ve had countless conversations with industry experts about this and come up with the following list.

Why reviewing resumes is broken:

  1. Resumes can create false pretenses about candidates (good or bad) due to the pattern recognition practices required to evaluate large volumes of resumes.
  2. Resumes offer so much information about a person that it can take hours to properly dissect and understand everything. (Company backgrounds, awards, technologies, employment patterns etc.)
  3. Smart people can be terrible at writing resumes and “less productive” people can be great at embellishing their accomplishments.
  4. Unconscious bias towards, companies, titles, names, age, and race can prevent quality candidates from being considered.

With so many potential issues in the review process, it’s amazing that recruiters only spend an average of 6 seconds per resume. It would take so much time and mental capacity to completely evaluate a resume that it is not a practical approach for many recruiters under serious time restrictions. Often times, it’s easier to find candidates in the ballpark, then let the managers decide. This leads to even bigger problems because managers lack the time to fully understand a candidate’s foundation. Hello, bad hires.

Our approach to combat this is to help recruiters and managers ensure that resumes are evaluated with more depth than the 6 second, simple pattern recognition in place today. Vettd highlights the most relevant candidates based on millions of attributes while removing potential bias. This creates an opportunity to focus energy on getting to know the right candidates.

Latest Articles

View All

The use cases for AI you didn't know existed

You've probably read about how AI is being used in data security, financial trading, healthcare, fraud detection, or elsewhere. AI has taken hold in these industries, in part, because there is “big data” associated with each and ready-made AI solutions. But, what about the industries or use cases that don’t involve mountains of numerical data?

February 3, 2021

Talent classification cited as a new way for organizations to improve internal talent mobility

In the December 7th issue of First Analysis Quarterly Insights, managing director Corey Greendale concludes that there’s a significant information gap that makes it difficult for organizations to optimize internal talent mobility.

February 3, 2021

What it’s like to be intern at Vettd.ai

Vettd.ai college interns are gaining a unique perspective about the difference between classroom learning and real-world experience. They are being challenged to use open-source and low-cost software components to create prototype applications to compliment or compete with alternative approaches to natural language processing (NLP) solutions.

February 3, 2021